On 4/11/12 8:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynbv32, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully
working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his
costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him
lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee
whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their
defense costs.

This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true,
there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation.

Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of
money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict
will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee.

Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw-
trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html



Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody
involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL!


You sure live in a strange little world, little toad man.