BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:58:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:27:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 22882974.3759.1331731749391.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@vbtf26, says...

On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:56:50 PM UTC-4, Wayne. B wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:46:33 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

Down here in SWFL we've actually got an R/C "Air Park" up on the north
end of town. They fly all sorts of stuff there including jets.

They used to be very common at military bases, but not so much anymore.

===

Given the high state of today's technology, there's a lot of potential
for criminality of various sorts with an R/C model.

Not really, Wayne. That's a pretty common misconception among the public, but I've been modeling off and on for 35+ years, and flying RC for the last 12 years. An RC airplane or helicopter's ability to deliver a payload is pretty limited, both in weight and in range. There are far more effective, easier and cheaper ways to accomplish what you're alluding to.

The best use of RC technology for nefarious purposes is video surveillance using a helicopter.

Oh, and High Power Rocketry, and the availability of those motors to the "public" is another one of those hobbies that get a bad rap. Opponents want to shut it down, claiming that they can be used to target an airplane, but that's highly unlikely to be successful. The military experimented with unguided rockets, and they never got close to a hit. Guided of course stand a much better chance, but by the time you've developed the technology, you could also develop
your
own motors, etc. There are obviously far easier methods, as we've seen very clearly over the last few years, unfortunately.

These things are just hobbies that some people with over-active imaginations think might be used for evil. That kind of thinking leads to (has already led to) restricting the RC and Rocketry hobbies. It's completely ridiculous.

/soapbox off/ :-)

I dabbled in R/C planes, but with mixed results! I never really got the
hang of bringing the plane back because everything is backwards then! I
could go outbound nicely, but coming back was hell!

That's the way it is in the real world also.

No it's not. You are still situated in the plane the same way in real
life, or do you sit backwards when you come back?

Hopefully you've not turned your back on the model when landing, so you're still situated the same
with respect to your model. And, I was referring, for the most part, to your last sentence.

But, Kevin, I can see where I gave you enough room to attempt an argument. So...my bad.

**** you.