On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:36:37 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/24/11 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:17:22 -0500, X `
wrote:

The problem, of course, is that nukes-ready-to-go are available from the
weaponry stolen from the former Soviet states and, probably, from
Pakistan. Since we don't really patrol our borders or seaports, it seems
reasonable one can be "snuck" in to create havoc. When it goes off, I
hope it isn't going off in DC.

If I was going to worry about Iran it would be if they simply leaked
out some high level material, not really fissile but bad enough to
shut down a city with a dirty bomb.
You really hope our borders are secure enough to prevent it but they
manage to bring in tons of illegal drugs with no real problem.

DC is the natural target, although New York would probably cause more
real damage.



The borders of this country have never been "secure," and I doubt
Americans are willing to pay the price to make them so. Sigh. I know DC
is the primary target...I'd rather it were anywhere in, say, Texas.

the problem is that only the crazed, insane, delusional ron paul is
wiling to say what needs to be said:

end the war on drugs.it's a failure. that would end alot of the flow
of weapons and money over the border.