On 11/22/2011 1:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/11/2011 4:41 AM, Bob Cratchet wrote:
On 11/22/2011 3:56 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
Hands down, Trump would be best.

Has a strong personality and leadership. Will not put up with civil
servant bull**** and will make the constipated government make a move.

Has proven recovery from bankruptcy experience. Knows money when it is
tight times.

Isn't a professional politician crook. Isn't guilty (yet) like Gingrich,
Reid, Pelosi... of insider trading via the government office. Hates
bailouts and thinks 0bama was patronage.

Isn't going to hold back if some idiot in government needs a kick to
move ass.

Not all mouth like 0bama.

Hope Donald runs, he might be the best choce. Say Trump/Paul... a kick
ass ticket for change and hope, not the need a change and a bailout
0bama.

Knows how to dig to see who stole the money. Bet he wound expose them
too. And unlikely a Freemason so no strings attached.

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/20...-out-2012-run/




Might even put American back in the game.

The last thing we want is a Prima Donna who is interested in himself and
would cough up to the first lobbyist that came along.
He has screwed som many people that worked for him, contracted, with
him, etc that it is amazing.

Funny, that makes him a good candidate. About time government got a
screwing instead of living in glass houses and Ivory towers if
corruption. Just the right man for the job to clean up DC.

DC is more corrupt than Venezuela as only one corrupt person is allowed.
Pit the criminals up on each other.

Get a cleaner house that way.
It is amazing that here and elsewhere the debate has become who is the
best at screwing other people, can tell lies that the most people
like,or he or she is less of a crook than than the guy across the isle
or tv screen.
Who would have ever thunk Americans would play this game?