On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:39:33 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/11/2011 2:44 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 4:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/11/2011 11:47 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 11/13/2011 1:18 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/11/2011 6:52 AM, drifter wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:56:59 -0800 (PST), "*e#c"

wrote:
On Nov 12, 3:45 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Yep, just more 0bama corruption an congress not moving to
impeach
0bama..=
..



http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...allpox-2011111..



.

Corrupt DC, ruining the America dream with debt, bailouts
and
corruption.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is
government is
the problem.


Flagged as spam

Cool. What newsreader lets you do that?

Mozilla Thunderbird. Micro$oft stuff is crap.

http://www.mozilla.org/en-GB/thunderbird/

Best part about Thunderbird is it designed to work with mail
from all
sources, not just Micro$oft lock in ware. You can configure
it for
multiple email sources, news and like all in one.

I must be a real dummy. I looked all over the Thunderbird news
client
and didn't see any reference to spam.

Spam is best handed at the server, but Thunderbird does have
some
options. I get very little spam in email, my local ISP, GMail,
Yahoo and
others work well and just one client for them all including
news.

It worked with my IMAP server using Postfix and Spam Assassin
for years.
But just retired it two weeks ago.


There are ways to minimize spam emails in t'bird, but it is a
bit more
involved to do it with t'bird and usenet. I could easily set up
a usenet
filter to filter you out and call it Canuck-Spam, but it would
be a
filter, not strictly spam. The net result is the same,
though...you
don't see the offending posts.

Not at all for the literate.

Tools-Message Filters too hard for ya?





Don't read much before you post, eh? What do you suppose a
"Canuck-Spam" filter in usenet would be?


Your boy slammer knows about usenet *spam* filters. Ask him.