On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:20:40 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend
with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off
the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough
to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational
guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I
don't
see him beating Obama.

Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else...


I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then
putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es
off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt,
grunt, grunt.

Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty.

Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one
liners from Harry, clever? LOL!

Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election.

You voted for the black guy because you knew he was the better choice,
regardless of color.

Among candidates presently announced, he's still the better choice. If
anyone with a brain and some integrity showed up on the Republican
side, they wouldn't give 'em a second look, just like Huntsman.

He's the only guy on their side with a good chance of beating Obama
and they haven't a clue. The collective consciousness on the right
hovers just about Snotty's intellectual elevation.

They're not about to back someone who can win when they can rally
around a platitude flinging pig like Cain.