On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:41:20 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
om...



LAtest news...apparently one of the paid-off women received a check for
a full year's salary.

Nothing to talk about... snerk

----------------------------------------------

True or not true, guilty or not guilty, one thing that really ****es me off
is that the media can keep these women's identities
anonymous. Seems to me that if you are going to publically accuse someone
of wrongdoing, you should be identified.

This is particularly true *if* the allegations are true *and* the women
involved accepted any "settlement" in return for a
non-disclosure. Cain didn't bring the subject up. The media dug it out
of alleged "victims" who apparently agreed to
keep their mouths shut in the settlement.

Be it what it is, it's too bad. Herman Cain may be an oddity, maybe he's
financed by the Koch brothers, maybe he has a
fondness of women (he certainly wouldn't be the first ... and at least he
prefers the opposite sex) but the guy isn't a dummy.
His Bachelor's is in Mathematics, holds a Master's in Computer Science and
has a track record of success with Pillsbury in turning
around underperforming business units in record time. He may not be
presidential material, but he is certainly different and
somewhat entertaining.

Cain has no chance of beating President Obama. Actually, none of the
current Republican candidates do, including Romney.
Unless President Obama makes a huge, royal screw up in the next 12 months,
he will be elected to a second term. Not a
landslide by any means .... but I predict he will be victorious.

Eisboch

Glad to hear that, Richard. I made a wager with a guy on Huffington
Post that Obama was going to prevail. If I'm wrong, I have to
contribute to his church and if I'm right he has to give money to the
nearest chapter of Planned Parenthood.