BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On 10/26/2011 2:38 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.

Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....
Never said he knew nothing, why must you always lie. I said it was
requested by the Navy, and it was.. Period...

Okay, I guess you are too narrow minded to read. You do realize that
Bush could have told them that was inappropriate and had it taken down,
don't you. The trouble with this conversation is that because Navy
personnel put it up, you try, because you can't bring yourself to say
anything bad about Bush, to present that the banner wasn't for Bush.
I've proven several times yesterday that what Eisboch said about the
banner being for the ship's mission is just not true.