View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Drifter[_2_] Drifter[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 823
Default Gun Safety Course

On 10/19/2011 7:59 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 10:04 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400,
wrote:

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote:


Just like it should be, father to son.

Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots
son

A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area
during a
gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of
North
96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department.

I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail
the
irony in the incident:

They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each
other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the
different makes and models of each other’s handguns.

The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make
his
gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father
pulled the trigger.

The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with
non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was
reported
the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call.

So, using that logic, this:

http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme

proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed.

Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns.

I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So,
what does that prove?

Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in
determining the value or equivalency of debate points.

You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and
don't relate.

What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts...

Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument.

my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest
folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly...


I haven't seen *you* debate anyone in here. You don't debate, you argue.


Come to think of it, you haven't EVER participated in a debate here.
Your pattern is consistent. After one or two counter points, you give up
and start name calling and insulting. Your weak, lazy mind is never able
to follow through in your side of a debate. There are some fine minds
here that are capable of participating in a rousing debate but they wont
engage you because you are just a ****ing asshole.