On 10/11/11 2:52 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/11/2011 12:38 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/11/2011 10:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/11/2011 8:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/10/2011 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/10/2011 9:59 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/10/2011 8:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/9/2011 5:00 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 4:55 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/10/2011 12:43 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 2:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:


Or are we already there? Civil and moral behavior is
a mater of degree.
Lefty march on Wall Street for example, the masses
not thinking with
rationality, but with envy and greed stoked up by
unscrupulous
politicians.

Oh, I think the March on Wall Street is perfectly
moral and rational in
its goals of pointing out Wall Street greed and its
looting of America.
The immorality is within the Wall Street and banking
crowd.

I don't know what the various marches will accomplish,
though.

Just a bunch of irrational fleabaggers thinking with
their envy, greed
and sorry asses looking for a fee lunch.



They're perfectly rational and they have identified the
enemy.


Have you listened to any of the coverage? You are lying
again, these
fleabaggers are all over the place. Half of them answered
"I don't
really know" when asked what they were protesting. That
is until Obama
sent in the SEIU to organize them last week...

Funny, teabaggers protesting is just great, left wingers
protesting is
terrible......

Listen, I already proved this morning you are either way
uninformed, or
dishonest. You doubted a statement I made, mocked me and I
proved it was
correct.. So now you are gonna' do it again instead of
turning on some
responsible news besides Jon Stewart and Bozo the Clown. If
you do you
will see these are not even protesters, they are partying,
and hanging
out. The signs are just to justify the gathering..
Period... But go
ahead, mock me until I prove you wrong again...

They aren't protesting????? Are you ****ing nuts?????

http://occupywallst.org/



Well, they are ****ing and ****ting all over the place...
TeaParty never
did that... not to mention they are just astroturf.

Now tea partiers are above ****ing and ****ting? And where did
you get
this info from?

Sorry, you are just too stupid to converse with anymore..

Uh huh......

Dude, you are intellectually lazy.. read the thread. I never said
repubs
don't ****, I said they don't **** on cop cars and in the street
while
living off the government, attending "Woodstock" 2011...

Yeah, yeah, teabaggers good, I get it. You should be on the side
of the
protesters, you are complaining that you've lost so much! Oh, forgot,
it's all Obama's fault!!


Nope, I really blame my personal loss on real estate on Dodd and
Frank..
but go ahead, lie some more...

YOU are the one lying. Just last week you were talking about how you
lost money in real estate because of Obama.

I guess you forgot about when you said THIS:

"My financial problem stem around the investment in my homes going
under
50% in less than two years thanks to Obama selling us out to Freddie
and
Fanny, for a loooooot of cash, and my pocket money being sucked up by
Pelosi and Obama with their doubling of the gas prices... raising
insurance rates, food prices, etc.. I used to have a couple hundred
extra a week or so, just on gas alone were spending at least 100 of
that
just to live, and 50 of it for the Obama raise in food and commodities
prices...

If it wasn't for the price of gas and food doubling, I would still be
just fine... Period..."


Dodd, Frank, Kerry and Obama...

The above doesn't say anything like that. Besides, I've asked and still
want to know, just exactly what did Obama do that DIRECTLY affected your
finances? You DO realize that the problems with mortgages was under Bush
don't you?

He sold us out to Fannie and Freddie for more money than any other
congressman took in a decade, and he was only in the House for two years!


How much of your investment have you lost on the cost-free house you
inherited from your father?