Thread: Due Process???
View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
BAR[_2_] BAR[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default Due Process???

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:35:25 -0400,
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:01:47 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400,
wrote:

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

That is not American soil, it is in Cuba, precisely why we put them
there. This is not an embassy. Gitmo is a particularly ambiguous
place. Legally it is simply leased from Castro, just like a base in
Japan, Germany or Turkey. We actually send them a check every year
that they refuse to cash.
We can even say we are following the laws of Cuba since locking up
political prisoners there is the normal thing to do.
Obama must see the convenient irony too since he has done nothing to
change the situation.

It was a poor attempt to subvert the American Justice system, in
particular the FISA court. A needless criminal act, which carries
ramifications to this day.



It was actually somewhat legal, particularly if they call them POWs.
That all gets back to whether this is actually a war.
If it isn't a war, why are we bombing people?
Would it be better if we just murdered these people anonymously, like
the Israelis? Perhaps.
I don't think we have much to show from the $3 trillion we spent doing
it with massive force.


I believe, according to law, "wars" are declared, not contrived.


Depends upon whose law you are talking about.