View Single Post
  #140   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
[email protected] emdeplume@hush.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default Wally-Mart in trouble locally

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:53:31 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:06:43 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:18:52 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:10:37 -0400,
wrote:


We were not talking about malls, we were talking about bars and
restaurants. If a person wants to have a "smoking allowed" restaurant
on a separate lot, you have no reason to be there if smoke bothers
you.
I bet you don't spend a lot of time in strip joints either, no matter
how good the food is..

So, you're now claiming that there are no restaurants or bars in
malls? Restaurants are by nature public. There's no Fed ban. These are
local and state issued bans. Too bad if you don't like what your state
has done.

The law applies equally to a restaurant in a mall and one out on a
lonely dead end road. Are you saying that if it was away from the mall
it could allow smoking. Otherwise you are trying to change the subject
again.


Take a limiting case... Imagine driving down a highway in the middle
of nowhere. You need to use the toilet and finally you come across the
only restaurant for miles. Unfortunately, it's a smoking establishment
and you're allergic to cig smoke.

So, that's why it applies equally


That is bull****. You really had to stretch for that one.


The limiting case is a legitimate logic tool. Look it up.

"There could be no fairer destiny for any physical theory than that it
should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives
on as a limiting case." Albert Einstein