On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:34:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ...

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter


Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?


===========================
reply:
The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a
driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained
about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one
drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving,
and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license.

Well then the company went above and beyond already.

My guess, some senator or congress people indirectly or directly own his
competition and the idea is to lean on him.

Was looking over net worth history of some politicians the other day.
And notices how many seem to be able to consistently pick names you
never heard of that take off in the markets. Almost as if they get a
regular feed of good inside tips for favors.

You "guess" a lot, but mostly, you just spout Rush's garbage. You're
100% stupid.