On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:50:01 -0400, X ~ Man
wrote:

On 8/20/11 11:05 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Aug 20, 10:17 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:20:20 -0400, X ~
wrote:

On 8/20/11 8:23 PM, JustWait wrote:
**** Unions. I will never buy another product with a Union Label again.
To all you union turds, screw you!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...suit-idUSN1E77...

Of course remember, when Obama sold GM to the Canadians and the Unions,
he promised and I quote "all warranties will be honored"... This guy
sold us out, he is a traitor. I hope after he is out of office, he is
tried, convicted, and spends the rest of his fleabagger life in prison...

S.O.P for corporations emerging from bankruptcy, little dum****. But it
hasn't been adjudicated yet, so the outcome is not certain.

As usual, this moron doesn't know anything about the case. I did a
quick read athttp://www.courthousenews.com/2011/06/30/GM.pdf. It's a
class action about a defective spindle rod (whatever that is).
Basically, something that causes excessive tire wear. It has nothing
to do with union workers. It probably has to do with a design flaw.

As usual you use words like "probably" to support whatever lie you
happen to be telling at the time....

For those capable of thinking, the differences between "probably" and
"certainty" are significant. For morons like you, not so much.

Hey, yesterday you said your daughter already was 18 and would be
graduating during the upcoming school year at the halfway point. Was she
held back for academic reasons?

This moron isn't capable of thinking. He certainly isn't capable of
reading. Of course, a design flaw must be a result of union workers
who assemble something. I guess management just lets them do whatever
they want, including designing cars from the ground up.