On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:33:49 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 18/08/2011 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:20:31 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:39:16 -0400, John
wrote:

Take the limiting case of two tankers. The one overtaking is 700 ft
long. The one being overtaken is 300 ft long. Your claim that the
smaller one must get out of the way of the bigger one is nonsense.

In that example both boats re restricted in their ability to maneuver
by virtue of their size. They are governed by the rules of the road
however which say that the vessel being overtaken is the "stand on"
vessel (see COLREGS definitions). That said, both vessels have the
obligation to avoid a collission. If there is doubt about another
vessels intent, they are *required* to make contact on the radio
and/or signal their intentions using whistles or horns.

In the case I cited, the "stand on" vessel is being overtaken. This
has nothing to do with Rule 18b International, and has nothing to do
with size per se, which is what dummy was arguing.

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:
(i) a vessel not under command;
(ii) a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;
(iii) a vessel engaged in fishing.

Well fleabagger parrot, (i) doesn't apply, both ships were under command
and under way in a main channel. See the buoy?

(ii) freighter has less maneuverability, you loose. (iii) not applicable.

Clearly the freighter was not over taking the sail boat. For that to
happen the sailboat wold have to be about 120 degrees to starboard.
Confused? Not surprising given your IQ and genetic damage.

So what part of the sail boat needed to yield that you don't understand?

What part of brain dead do you not understand? You're talking about
something that has nothing to do with my comment. As usual, you're an
idiot.