On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:40:30 -0400, X ~ Man
wrote:

On 8/14/11 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.


Canuckles seems to have a lot of trouble with those of us who give
specific reasons for not being fans of Bachmann, Palin, Perry, or any of
the other crazies seeking the GOP nomination. He thinks I dislike her
because of her gender, which is beyond funny, because my preferred
candidate in the 2008 primary fight was...Hillary Clinton. My disdain
for Palin in that election was not based upon her gender, but on her
ignorance, demagoguery, and intellectual laziness.

Canuckles, like most conservatives here, has a real problem with
abstract thinking and those capable of it.

I agree. I was torn between an amazingly qualified candidate, Hillary,
and someone who had an inspirational message of hope and change. As a
woman, Clinton's and Obama's candidacies reinforced my long-held
belief that it is possible to win against the forces of darkness and
evil that people like Palin represent.