On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:23:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 10/08/2011 2:59 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:44:24 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 4:34 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:19:39 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 2:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:11:37 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:


Looks like it's time for the citizens of London to arm themselves and
start picking off the fleabagger leftys burning their city to the
ground... Seems all they are doing is stealing and robbing and burning..
Yep, to bad the citizens there don't have access to firearms.. bet if a
few dozen punks got shot in the face, things would settle down pretty
quickly there...


we have firearms here

11,000 dead last year. how many dead in london?

oh.

zero

How many of those 11,000 were druggies doing each other over? That is
hardly a loss to fret about.

we're not the only ones with druggies.

I had no intent on citing skin color, white, black or hispanic doper, a
dead doper is one less problem for society. But since you mention race,
does seem like blacks have a higher than proportional crime in US society.

ever been to london? there are black people there too.

sorry to disappoint you

Yep, was there in 1981. While I lived in Aberdeen for a year and a
half. Been to see the Queen. Unlike you, I have no criminal record so
I can travel.

So? There were also hindu, chinese too. Since you are the expert, why
do blacks statistically have a higher propensity for crime everywhere?

Bull. You've never left your backwater hideout. I doubt you get out of
your single-wide trailer more than once a month for a beer run.