On 24/07/2011 12:41 PM, Harryk wrote:
In articlee7abb17c-a5e5-4770-83ac-4a2d683a2b03
@bl1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 24, 10:24 am, John wrote:
On Jul 23, 11:01 pm, North wrote:





On Jul 23, 8:45 pm, John wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur

I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.

If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.

Why do they pick only on boat owners?

What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.

Donnie, how do you define 'fair share'. Remember, we have about 47% of
our population who pay *no* federal income taxes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I would say that anyone earning above the 'poverty level', as defined
by the gov't, should start paying taxes. even if at a minimal rate.

Don, you have me intrigued. Please show me, fiscally how this would
work.

Canada defines poverty level as $1038/month. But I defy anyone to live
in Canada for that.

What do the million pus tent families in the US get? But you are less
likely to freeze to death in California.

--
Obama, enslaving Americans with debt-tax slavery for a spending binge.
Doesn't even borrow real money, Bernanke just creates it like a
counterfeiter. .