OT--new candidate
The report that terrorists might use commercial aircraft as weapons came in
1998 from some info discovered in the Phillipines. What did Clinton do with
that info from 1998 until 2000 to make our aircraft safer? Both Presidents
"Bush 43" and Clinton were guilty of not taking more action on this
info...but only one of 'em passed up several chances at getting bin Laden.
"jps" wrote in message
...
Nor if the current president paid any attention to the repeated messages
that indicated those hostile to the US were contemplating using US
carriers
as weapons against our country.
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
4 months, 2 years, and 4 years. That's why I want those maniacs dealt
with
now.
3000 people likely wouldn't have died in the WTC if a certain prior
President dealt with bin Laden when he had the chance...and the 300 or
so
soldiers that recently were killed in Iraq likely wouldn't have died if
Bush
41 didn't worry so much about what the UN thought, and marched
Schwarzkopff
into Baghdad in the first Gulf War.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
Mark,
I think the absolute worst thing that could happen would be if a guy
like
Dean won the Presidency and pulled us out of Iraq too soon. The
repercussions would be awful. "Rack up enough US casualties, get
the
media
to play along, and we can control the infidels".
At least if a guy like World War III Wesley was in charge, we could
be
sure
he'd probably nuke someone over there before long...and that can't
be
*all*
bad.
Hey...you're starting to sound like my father, around 1968-1969, who
thought
we should "throw everything we've got" at North Vietnam. Suddenly,
when
I
got my draft card, he got a little antsy about what was going on over
there.
How old are YOUR kids, NOYB?
|