jps wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Clark's candidacy is being orchestrated by the Clintonista's...and most
people know that "Clinton" and "truth" should not even appear in the same
sentence.

THere's more honor and forthrightness in any Clinton bone (yes, including
that one) than in any of the buffoons who inhabit and control the White
House currently, apart from Colin Powell.

Blinded by partisanism eh? Clinton was a slippery as a greased pig. Who
else would try to define ther word "Is"? The Clinton presidency was a
prime example of setting policy by poll numbers, versus by character and
conviction to principles.


Even if Clark says that he'll roll back tax cuts, he'll make it sound
like
heaven in comparison to four more years of moronic moves by the buffoon
in
office now.

Rolling back tax cuts during a rebounding economy would result in a double
dip recession...and possibly a depression. That sound like "heaven" to
you?

Rolling back tax cuts on the richest Americans regains us close to $100
billion dollars in our annual budget. You think that'll cause a double dip
recession? Starting where, at Tiffany's?

Rolling back my tax break will do nothing but **** me off. And where do
you get off calling me "rich"? That's the biggest lie that the
Democtrats have been trying to pull over everyone's eyes. The tax break
was across the board, which means we ALL got a break, proportional to
what we put in. I'd never vote for anyone who is in favor of taking more
money from me.

Dave