On Jul 1, 12:10*pm, Richard Casady
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch









wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:01 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:29:35 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/06/2011 12:13 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:52:25 -0600,
wrote:

On 27/06/2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:08:03 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

The younger gen of girls have let themselves go (or course I expect
the guys have too). Cruising up and down the Wakulla River yesterday
watching the young'uns swimming in the clear cold water, I expected to
see a few good lookin girls. We passed one boat full of kids and my
friend says, "Look at the babes on that boat", I reply, "I thought the
manatees were supposed to be in the water". Whatever happened to the
beautiful slender girls of my youth? The girls of my youth all had
flat tummies, not an ounce of fat and not a muffin top in sight.
Today, it looks like the strategic petroleum reserve in bikinis.

Unfortunately, even though you have a small sample, people, esp. kids
are having more and more weight problems. There's a biological reason
for it, as well as a social/economic element. More poor people tend to
eat lower quality food, which is higher in fat/sugar content.

Funny. I would have thought it was lazy liberal types that don't know
how to cook good food and rely on junk food. Cultural/social, yes, lazy
breeds lazy. Body problems don't evolve in 1 or 2 generations without a
degenerate change in social values and culture.

Face it, undisciplined lazy lard asses. But then the parents never
taught them any different.

You're really a one-trick pony aren't you. Honestly, it's really
boring. You've got to be right NO MATTER WHAT or your self-esteem is
going to suffer. I really pity you.

So I guess you buy stretch pants. And yes, I tend to be right more
often than not.

I don't have to guess that your tiny penis can't be found inside they
folds of your belly.

You're right wing, not right. There's a big difference (of course,
you're too stupid to know that).

Although I knew lots of good looking girls in college, I simply could
not afford to date much at all. *College cost $15/quarter hour then
and I needed 15 quarter hours and was paid $1.80/hr *to clear survey
paths with a machete in the heat. *After school and housing was paid
for, I was down to diluting pancake mix with more and more flour every
day just to eat. *MY second date with my wife, we both wandered around
picking up soft drink bottles for the deposit so we could go to a
cheap movie, still married 32 yrs later too. *Not much opportunity to
get fat then.

In 1966 tuition at Iowa State was $95 per quarter. Not per quarter
hour, per quarter.

Casady

And a good paying job was 3 bucks an hr. and gas was .29c By todays
standards that $95.00 was cheaper'n dirt. but then it was a load!