On 21/06/2011 6:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:36:20 -0700, wrote:
Yeah, many of the conditions now are the same as the conditions then.
*TRY READING* Man wasn't around 500 million years ago creating the
conditions causing the mass extinctions. I'll bet the sun was.
Jeez, no wonder no one will talk to you.
Stick with name-calling.
So, if I say that there's a condition called high blood pressure, then
there can be one and only one cause for that condition? Try looking up
the word condition:
Truth is that no one really knows for sure what caused mass
instinctions or ice ages in the past. There has been a lot of
research and informed speculation but nothing that I'd describe as
conclusive. The one thing we know for sure is that past actions of
mankind had nothing to do with it. The other thing we know for sure
is that large numbers of people in and out of academia are competing
for research funding and they are not above releasing a dramatic press
release every now and then. Anyone who takes all of these dire
pronouncements as gospel needs to get a life.
Some are known. The impact craters says all.
We do know ice ages reduce diversity of life. When atomosheric carbon
and warmer temperatures existed, the north slop of Alaska had ferns and
biodiversity peeked.
Which makes me wonder, why are the eco freaks worried about a little
warming? More farm land up north to help feed the starving *******s
having too many kids. Lets hope it is warming as NY city under ice
isn't going to support anyone.
Historically, earth is currently on the cooler side of its history.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.