On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:01:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 5:10 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:17:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 4:07 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:48:46 -0600,
wrote:
and why the right wants to destroy it. the right is an elitist,
property based ideology that hates the middle class

Screw unions, they are just the other side of the greed coin.


really? then why do countries that have strong unions have strong
manufacturing?

You mean like Japan? Lets examine that.

Unions in Japan DEMAND loyalty or management will not run you off, the
unions will. Unions are also responsible in helping management make a
modest, sustainable profit, and to address employee issues. Hell, they
are more like a HR department than a union.

let's see. let's look at germany, shall we?

30% unionized work force

unemployment is 7% vs 9% here

their manufacturing base is stronger. as it is with much of the OECD.



CEOs are expected to resign when they lay off people for issues not
involving the laid off persons performance. And very rare to see a CEO
get paid more than 10 times the lowest wage they pay.

yep. and here in the good ol' free market US, CEO's get HUNDREDS of
times what the average worker gets


Strikes rare too. As government will step in and tell the unions to get
back to work or quit if demands are not reasonable for the type of work.

You do know socialist worker unions started the Nazi movement right?

uh...no they didnt. you lying sack of **** nazi lover. since when did
you start loving hitler?

Look it up, they did.

i did. the first thing hitler did was to kill the union leaders

you dont know **** about history