BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and
guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they
were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more
than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they
claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've
said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you
to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you
haven't yet) then you owe me an apology.

Then why did you say this:

Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same
thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something...
Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even
related.

You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other.
Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has
nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and
more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that
I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I
lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology.

Steve