On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:55:37 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.


I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not
targeting people for assassination.
Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil
war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000
troops.

It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they
made the right choice and blew his head off on site.

Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could
not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if
he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story.

There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the time.
I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are
doing.

So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including the
motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give Obama
an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down.


Not at all but it is clear this was a hit, no more, no less. The SEALs
have reported that there was only one armed person there, the courier,
who they shot right away, then they shot 3 more unarmed people,
including Bin Laden. This is the report the government has released.
I think they all needed killing.

So, you don't know all or even most of the details, yet you're
claiming you know it was a "hit." Sounds like you're just looking
around for an excuse to claim Obama is evil.