On 5/2/2011 5:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/05/2011 2:04 PM, OmDeFlume wrote:
On 5/2/2011 3:57 PM, Hairy Kraut wrote:
In articleuPudnYiv54xwlCLQnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/05/2011 1:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/05/2011 8:23 AM, Harryk wrote:

May 2, 2011
2012 Election Cancelled
Obama Buoyed by 100 Percent Approval Rating

Wait until people learn how long it took Obama to authorize it. Some
stuff I have read indicates Obama knew since August last year.

Oh, please. It was obviously a deliberate plan, executed
deliberately.

Go **** yourself.

Go f- yourself fleabagger.

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/publ...terrorism.html




In above search for August.

Who cares? The only thing you are trying to do is cheapen this bit of
success that belongs to the u.s. military, the cia, and obama. Oh, and
your quoted piece does not state Obama knew Osama was there last
August.

Once again, go **** yourself.

But you have such disdain for the U.S. military, Harry, I'd think you'd
be the first to start yelling that it was money not well spent. You did
say how stupid it was when Bush was president.
At least under Bush, Saddam got the benefit of a fair trial.

Osama had over 300 indictments and warrants from various countries.

Gadafi, different story. That one is a vindictive baby killing botch
job. But wait, we can get Osama to make government plotted
assassinations look good.

BTW, I agree with going for Osama. But not Kadafi. In Kadafi's case it
is to shut him up, gain control of a central bank and oil. If they wnt
to assassinate him, present the evidence and not the deception.

I'm glad the the Osama case is closed. I hope it was really him and not
a stunt double. Only the fishes know for sure. But, what strikes me
funny, is the same bleeding heart civil rights progressive assholes who
cried out for the rights of those poor souls detained in Gitmo cheered
at the news that Osama was murdered.