On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:57:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/04/2011 8:25 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:19:24 -0600,
wrote:
any specifics?

no. i thought not. you ahve glen beck and rush and all the right wing
blather

and NO specifics at all. none

Funny, your own government screws you with letting banks screw up, and
in fact government is one of the biggest delinquent debtors in the world
and you blame wall street.

HAHAHAHA he contradicts himself in ONE SENTENCE!!

'letting banks screw up' AND it's wrong to blame wall street?

ROFLMAO!!!


What do you mean by specifics? Stock symbols? Take your pick. 9/10
stocks or better bough Jan-Mar 2009 are now up big time. But does help
when you pick some like TCK-B. But doesn't have to be that good to make
money.

how about

elimiinating regulation of derivatives
letting the derivative market go to SIXTY TWO TRILLION dollars

do you READ your own ****??


Yep, while liberals and fleabagger were whining, crying, running with
fear I cleaned up.

first he says wall street SCREWED the country THEN he complains that
people are mad about it

and then he piles on his quaint, reader's digest view of economics

no wonder the right ****ed this country


Who has the largest debt in the world and hasn't make any serious
repayments in over 3 decades? USA Government. Who indirectly sets
interest rates? The government. Who said liberalized bad credit rules
and low down was OK for the banks? Government.

let's see

ALL of that was done by the right

ALL of that is due to supply side economics

ALL of that is from the chicago school...the most right wing view of
economics possible

BUT, somehow, he blames it on liberals. does he cite A SINGLE specific
policy?

nope.

a SINGLE action? nope.

nothing.

he has his reader's digest view of the world and that's all he needs

he's right wing