Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 10:19 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 9:33 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 6:54 AM, OmDeFlume wrote:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...a-deeper-hole/




Guess Arne has gone soft. Too much liberal bacon and BS in government
finally got to him.

It's sad that someone involved in a manslaughter had part of his
sentence commuted and Dick Cheney is still not in prison?

Funny, I would have thought Obama would be in prison for siding with
Libya rebels, al Qaeda affiliates that did 9/11.

But guess Obama bows to his hidden masters and big central banks as
Libya has a central bank they don't control. Then there is oil. And by
sending a cruise missile into Gaddafi's home, well, that is an attempted
assassination of a foreign official and without the approval of
congress. No provocation either.

If Gaddafi sent a missile to the Whitehouse would it not be called an
assassination attempt? Pretty darn clear who is the aggressor, Adolf
Obama.

But then again, hypocrisy and Obama are synonymous. What should really
worry Americans is that this is their government out of control.



Do you have some evidence the majority of the insurgents in Libya had
anything to do with 9/11?

You come across here like a psychotic, paranoid lunatic.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/


Washington Times good enough? Note the date is well before Obama
supported the rebels. So either Obama is supporting al Qaeda allies in
his head or he is one dumb MFer.

al Qaeda is probably laughing their heads off right now. All this free
US military support for their friends. Priceless.

And you know the CIA would have known. But maybe Obama is Christian on
the outside and Muslim on the inside.


And once again, you've demonstrated you do not understand what you read.
The article you cited did not state that the insurgents had anything to
do with 9-11. That's what I asked you, for proof of that claim of yours.
You have none. Oh, and the article said al qaeda offered help, it didn't
say it was involved. Finally, the Wash Times is a right-wing wingnut
paper, the print version of Faux News. In other words, it is trash.