View Single Post
  #192   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
[email protected] emdeplume@hush.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default Obama endorses slavery

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:58:24 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:58:26 -0700,
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:20:15 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:03:43 -0700,
wrote:



I already told you, I expect a means test and raising the retirement
age more than they already have. (it isn't 65 anymore, in case you
haven't noticed)


And, several people have already said that the "means" test already
exists for SS in the form of taxes. Why are you saying this over and
over?

Boater also points out the means test only takes about 12.5 to 23% of
the SS if you make over 32k. I am talking about a means test that will
take a lot more of it as your income increases up to 100%


So you want a 100% tax on SS? That's just plain weird.

Sounds to me like you're not very familiar with regular income tax.
Maybe you've been out of it too long.



OK let me put this in a perspective you can understand. Do you think a
person making over $250,000 a year in retirement should still get all
of their SS?


I think people should be taxed on the money they make no matter the
source.

If someone makes $250K/yr and receives and is normally supposed to get
$24K/yr in SS (don't know how much SS gets you per year - feel free to
adjust to whatever number you want), you are taxed on it. Is that
really the big issue of our time?