BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:40:29 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:24:26 -0700, wrote:

Which has minimal or nothing to do with the solvency of Social
Security.

The point is they are chipping away at the promise (we were told SS
would never be taxed), to make SS more solvent but, as you say, the
effect is minimal. I bet there are more promises that will be made
"inoperative" as this problem continues.

SS benefits are not taxed until you reach the threshold. Then you're
taxed. Why is that a problem for you?

There is no "chipping away," unless you mean the Republicans in the
House and Senate.

SS was supposed to always be tax free, at least that was the promise
when I started paying my FICA into it. Now it is taxed. I still bet it
will virtually be confiscated in the future if you have any other
significant source of income. My SS and pension alone is enough to
trip the tax trigger now and I haven't tapped my 401k yet.

Two things are certain to happen if SS is going to survive. The age
will go up and there will be a means test.
I know you deny it but you are in denial about all of these debt
problems.

Sure. Well, I'm not sure when you started paying into it, but in the
last millennium or so it's taxed after you reach the threshold.

There's already a "means" test, since if you make more than a certain
amount, it's taxed. It's possible that the age might have to be raised
and while that might be ok for white-collar workers, it's probably not
a very good thing for blue-collar.