Harryk wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 3:06 pm, wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2:39 pm, wrote:
It ain't over until it is over, but for two candidates to be a
couple of
hundred votes apart when more than a million votes were
cast...amazing.
If Kloppenburg wins, it will be a stiff repudiation of the state's
republican governor. The gov's man also lost in a race to run the
Milwaukee county government.
A "stiff repudiation" would be a landslide win. A win by 200 votes
out of a million is a dead heat, and is statistically insignificant.
Virtually half the state supports the governor.
One has to wonder how much the *unions* spent on the election. :-
The Repubs outspent the Dems.


There's no doubt that union money and thugs put the dems over the top
and in the lead. There was a lot at stake for them. That and a
little ACORN action, eh?

We've seen it before just a couple of years ago. The dems have a new
playbook on cheating.


You must have missed the part about the Repubs outspending the Dems, eh?

There's no doubt that corporate money and teahadist thugs accounted
for the large number of votes for the Republican incumbent. That and
the typical Republican dirty tricks.

We saw that before in 2000, when the Repubs and their thugs and their
proxies on the U.S. Supreme Court put Bush in the whiteHouse. Now that
was *the* new playbook on cheating.




Got a cite for that including the backroom deals?