On Apr 6, 3:53*pm, Harryk wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 3:32 pm, *wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 3:06 pm, * *wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2:39 pm, * * *wrote:
It ain't over until it is over, but for two candidates to be a couple of
hundred votes apart when more than a million votes were cast...amazing.
If Kloppenburg wins, it will be a stiff repudiation of the state's
republican governor. The gov's man also lost in a race to run the
Milwaukee county government.
A "stiff repudiation" would be a landslide win. *A win by 200 votes
out of a million is a dead heat, and is statistically insignificant..
Virtually half the state supports the governor.
One has to wonder how much the *unions* spent on the election. *:-
The Repubs outspent the Dems.
There's no doubt that union money and thugs put the dems over the top
and in the lead. *There was a lot at stake for them. *That and a
little ACORN action, eh?
We've seen it before just a couple of years ago. *The dems have a new
playbook on cheating.
Whoops...analysis from the post:

Why the left s showing in Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a big deal
By Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent? *A far left whacko and apologist. Meaningless tripe.

hehehe. *right. *sure. *heheheh.

You don't know who he is? He's ultra-left.


And the Republicans may have outspent the Dems, but when you add in
the *union* money spent, that puts the Dems over the top. *The union
pulled out all the stops on this one, and apparently could only pull
it out by 200 votes.

The repubs outspent the dems in total spending, from all sources.

The independent union spending isn't counted as dem spending.

You're beginning to sound a lot like Snotty Ingerfool.

You're just sounding like an old fool. A dizzy one.

Have fun.