BAR wrote:
In articleobOdnRSY75XxfQrQnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...
Harryk wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:33:06 -0600,
wrote:

On 31/03/2011 6:58 AM, Harryk wrote:
John H wrote:
...by the major media. Or did I just miss it?

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth...35832732.html#


You think an opinion piece in al jazeera should be widely reported?
Even
funnier, your belief that the United States is still the dog that wags
the rest of the world as if it were its tail.

Didn't you learn anything from your failures in Vietnam and your
failures in your life since then?
Funny, they are all over.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_English

No more or less corrupt than NBC, CNN, Fox etc. And they are
distributed to the world, not just the USA.

USA is quickly becoming the tail.

It was not the soldiers who failed in Vietnam, it was the politicians.
Get over it fleabagger.
Having been unable to become a soldier, Harry has not the knowledge
to belittle.
Unable? That's a laugh. I wasn't drafted.
To fat to fight...

Or a head case. Would you want to argue ever order or answer why you had
a guy in the brig for his entire enlistment?



Less than 10% of U.S. males *eligible* for the draft during our war
against the people of Vietnam were, in fact, drafted. I know you are
intellectually challenged, Bertie-Birther, but that means that
approximately 90% were not drafted. A number of guys who thought they
might be drafted went into the reserves back then, knowing the odds were
against them being called up and sent into that d.f. war. G.W. Bush did
that and in later years, even through there was no war, you did, too.
Hell's bells, you didn't even get an overseas assignment.