On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:50:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:59:40 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

No need to guess you're an idiot.

So did you buy your Obama Jack boots yet?

I think you've got the market corned on Jack boots!