BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:12:05 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:15:24 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:34:04 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:31:11 -0700, wrote:

He was just one player in a 20 year Bush/Clinton/Bush ... now Obama
government. The policy differences are largely cosmetic.

... and it starts again in Libya

No, he wasn't just "one player." He started a war of choice. He did
more than anyone else (unless you count Cheney) to undermine the US
economically, socially, and with foreign policy. Feel free to keep
defending him.

Nothing is starting "again" in Libya. More right-wing nonsense.

Fee free to ignore the contribution of the rest.

Huh? What contribution? The nuts don't contribute very much.

The contribution to all of the ills you blame on GWB. Clinton signed
all of the legislation that allowed and even encouraged the financial
co,llapse. GHWB is the one who got the Iraq war started with no exit
plan and both democrats have done nothing to get us out of Iraq, Obama
doubled down in Afghanistan with pretty much nothing to show for it.
He has also been in lock step with the GW financial program.
The people running our financial policy today are the same ones who
ran it in the ditch. Bob would point out, they all come from Wall
Street.

No. Never said that. Again, you just love to make things up. Read what
I said, and get back to us.

GHWB didn't go after Saddam over a lie. Afg. is a lot more stable, but
it's a long, hard slog. If Bush had stuck to it, we wouldn't be in
this mess.

I'm not completely happy with the way Obama has handled the Republican
intransigence.