Thread: An OT question
View Single Post
  #38   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Harryk Harryk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default An OT question

wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:26:23 -0700,
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:50:32 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:16:28 -0700,
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:42:10 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:06:50 -0700,
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:25:41 -0400,
wrote:

As distasteful as it is, those wackos apparently have the right to
protest.

At a certain point the reach the level of "fire in a crowded theater".


The Supreme Court spoke on this subject. They have the right to do it.

As I said, bikers have become sissies. I would expect Rolling Thunder
to explain they also have the right to get their ass kicked if they
don't take their protest down the road.
They don't have such a right. That's a threat.

Duh ... BIKERS. They are supposed to be a little threatening.

LOL Well, some are some aren't I guess.


Less the "Wild One" and more like the "Wild Hogs".

I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is
determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault.



Connecticut and Georgia?

Snotty Ingersoll* at several points threatened to show up here and teach
me a lesson, and so did the Loogy moron.

* It is embarrassing to me that Ingersoll lives in the state of my
birth. I no longer can claim that Connecticut Yankees are smarter than
the average bear since, with Ingersoll posting here, that obviously is
not true.