Thread
:
An OT question
View Single Post
#
38
posted to rec.boats
Harryk
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
An OT question
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:26:23 -0700,
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:50:32 -0400,
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:16:28 -0700,
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:42:10 -0400,
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:06:50 -0700,
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:25:41 -0400,
wrote:
As distasteful as it is, those wackos apparently have the right to
protest.
At a certain point the reach the level of "fire in a crowded theater".
The Supreme Court spoke on this subject. They have the right to do it.
As I said, bikers have become sissies. I would expect Rolling Thunder
to explain they also have the right to get their ass kicked if they
don't take their protest down the road.
They don't have such a right. That's a threat.
Duh ... BIKERS. They are supposed to be a little threatening.
LOL Well, some are some aren't I guess.
Less the "Wild One" and more like the "Wild Hogs".
I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is
determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault.
Connecticut and Georgia?
Snotty Ingersoll* at several points threatened to show up here and teach
me a lesson, and so did the Loogy moron.
* It is embarrassing to me that Ingersoll lives in the state of my
birth. I no longer can claim that Connecticut Yankees are smarter than
the average bear since, with Ingersoll posting here, that obviously is
not true.
Reply With Quote
Harryk
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Harryk