BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Harryk

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:15:12 -0400,
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:14:36 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:01:10 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:10:29 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:45:29 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:09:57 -0700, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:00:26 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:46:10 -0700, wrote:

No I just don't like stupid ideas.
Yet every and any liberal originated idea is terrible. If not, please
point to a few that are ok with you.
Water quality, habitat preservation, decriminalizing "sin" to name a
few
Nixon got the EPA going, T. Roosevelt founded the national park
system, you're claiming that Democrats didn't promote the war on
drugs?
Clinton's dea put more pot "criminals" in jail than Nixon and Reagan
put together ... if that is what you are saying.
You claimed it was a liberal agenda to decriminalize "sin." I pointed
out and you confirmed that's not the case, particularly.

FYI, I happen to agree that things like the EPA, habitat preserv., and
decriminalizing sin are the right things to do. They're not, however,
the exclusive agenda of the right or the left.

I do not consider Clinton that "liberal". He was the 4th Bush brother
and he admits it. I expect to see the Bushes, Clintons and Obamas all
out in Kennebunkport on Fidelity, laughing their ass off some day.
Now that's funny! I'm betting that your right-wing buddies would
probably disagree with the Clinton isn't a liberal comment.

Ummm... the Obamas are from Chicago. Have they even been to
Kennebunkport?
Probably not, neither had the Clintons until 2009.

Don't know or care about Fl politics, except when it comes to national
elections.
Then why are you blathering on in this topic?
Despite your insistence that this "topic" is about Florida, it isn't.
Can you read? The word Florida is in the topic title. You are the one
who started talking about a dozen other states.
Life and reality are bigger than Florida. Please show me a topic that
stayed put.
Just because you wander off, we don't have to follow you.
Yet, you're quite happy to participate. Don't want to talk about
Republicans being hypocrites... then don't.
In this case Scott is not hypocritical. He ran on not wanting the
money and when they tried to cram it down his throat he refused it and
went to court to get the feds to get off his back.

Scott is a criminal. He and his company were let off the hook during the
first couple of years of the Bush Admin. He should have been prosecuted.
His election is all the proof needed of the utter stupidity of florida
voters.

I am sure you voted for LBJ and Scott is a piker compared to that
crook.
Unfortunately when Jeb left, nobody who was really qualified was
willing to step up here. Sink was a bank lobbyist and I am not sure
that was the right choice either.

You're sure I voted for LBJ, eh?

In 1964, when Johnson ran for his own term, I was too young to vote in
the U.S. presidential election.

Had I been able to vote, I would have voted for Johnson. His opponent
then was Barry Goldwater. Back then, I would have considered Goldwater
too extreme to be president.

I got to know Goldwater pretty well in the late 1970's and 1960's when I
was a consultant to several of the national postal employee unions and
prepared testimony for presentation before a Senate committee on which
he served. He truly was a great man.

Nowadays, of course, he wouldn't have anything to do with the
race-hating, gay-bashing, white separatists who run the GOP.