BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:01:10 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:10:29 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:45:29 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:09:57 -0700, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:00:26 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:46:10 -0700, wrote:

No I just don't like stupid ideas.

Yet every and any liberal originated idea is terrible. If not, please
point to a few that are ok with you.

Water quality, habitat preservation, decriminalizing "sin" to name a
few

Nixon got the EPA going, T. Roosevelt founded the national park
system, you're claiming that Democrats didn't promote the war on
drugs?

Clinton's dea put more pot "criminals" in jail than Nixon and Reagan
put together ... if that is what you are saying.

You claimed it was a liberal agenda to decriminalize "sin." I pointed
out and you confirmed that's not the case, particularly.

FYI, I happen to agree that things like the EPA, habitat preserv., and
decriminalizing sin are the right things to do. They're not, however,
the exclusive agenda of the right or the left.

I do not consider Clinton that "liberal". He was the 4th Bush brother
and he admits it. I expect to see the Bushes, Clintons and Obamas all
out in Kennebunkport on Fidelity, laughing their ass off some day.

Now that's funny! I'm betting that your right-wing buddies would
probably disagree with the Clinton isn't a liberal comment.

Ummm... the Obamas are from Chicago. Have they even been to
Kennebunkport?

As I said, all (or nearly all) Republicans voted against the stim, and
most of them then put their hand out to want some of it after it
passed.

Having absolutely nothing to do with this subject. Scott did not want
nor did he take the money.

Having absolutely everything to do with the subject, whether or not
you like it.

How is that. If all of your articles were about taking stim money
after you voted against it how is refusing stim money the same.

? The Republicans voted against it, then they had their hands out for
it.

Yet this has nothing to do with the train we are talking about. They
turned down the money.

What about all the other cases where they voted against the stim and
then put their hands out _for_ the money?

Off topic and not what we are talking about

On topic and exactly what is being talked about...

Don't know or care about Fl politics, except when it comes to national
elections.

Then why are you blathering on in this topic?

Despite your insistence that this "topic" is about Florida, it isn't.

Can you read? The word Florida is in the topic title. You are the one
who started talking about a dozen other states.

Life and reality are bigger than Florida. Please show me a topic that
stayed put.

Just because you wander off, we don't have to follow you.

Yet, you're quite happy to participate. Don't want to talk about
Republicans being hypocrites... then don't.