On Mar 16, 12:45*am, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:09:57 -0700, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:00:26 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:46:10 -0700, wrote:

No I just don't like stupid ideas.

Yet every and any liberal originated idea is terrible. If not, please
point to a few that are ok with you.

Water quality, habitat preservation, decriminalizing "sin" to name a
few

Nixon got the EPA going, T. Roosevelt founded the national park
system, you're claiming that Democrats didn't promote the war on
drugs?

Clinton's dea put more pot "criminals" *in jail than Nixon and Reagan
put together ... if that is what you are saying.

As I said, all (or nearly all) Republicans voted against the stim, and
most of them then put their hand out to want some of it after it
passed.

Having absolutely nothing to do with this subject. Scott did not want
nor did he take the money.

Having absolutely everything to do with the subject, whether or not
you like it.

How is that. If all of your articles were about taking stim money
after you voted against it how is refusing stim money the same.

? The Republicans voted against it, then they had their hands out for
it.

Yet this has nothing to do with the train we are talking about. They
turned down the money.



Don't know or care about Fl politics, except when it comes to national
elections.

Then why are you blathering on in this topic?

Despite your insistence that this "topic" is about Florida, it isn't.

Can you read? The word Florida is in the topic title. You are the one
who started talking about a dozen other states.

Reading isn't her issue. Comprehension is.