View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
I_am_Tosk I_am_Tosk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,312
Default It's snerk time in Florida...again.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:00:26 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:46:10 -0700,
wrote:

No I just don't like stupid ideas.

Yet every and any liberal originated idea is terrible. If not, please
point to a few that are ok with you.


Water quality, habitat preservation, decriminalizing "sin" to name a
few


Nixon got the EPA going, T. Roosevelt founded the national park
system, you're claiming that Democrats didn't promote the war on
drugs?


As I said, all (or nearly all) Republicans voted against the stim, and
most of them then put their hand out to want some of it after it
passed.

Having absolutely nothing to do with this subject. Scott did not want
nor did he take the money.

Having absolutely everything to do with the subject, whether or not
you like it.


How is that. If all of your articles were about taking stim money
after you voted against it how is refusing stim money the same.


? The Republicans voted against it, then they had their hands out for
it.



Don't know or care about Fl politics, except when it comes to national
elections.



Then why are you blathering on in this topic?


Despite your insistence that this "topic" is about Florida, it isn't.


So, what you are saying is that every Democrat who voted to raise a tax
that didn't get raised, should write an extra check for that extra
amount every year anyway? Because that would be the same as a Senator
voting against a stim package but taking the money the law said he must
take after the bill was passed. Your insinuation is disingenuous... Like
just about every other post here from you...