On Mar 8, 6:07*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:57:47 -0500, Harryk
wrote:



On 3/8/11 1:40 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Many news orgs (try BBC) have reported on how Obama's ATF has been
running guns to Mexico supposedly as part of a "Sting" but these
thousands of weapons have been turning up actually being used by the
drug cartels and were used in the recent murder of a Border Patrol
agent who was only allowed to use beanbag ammo. *Much of the recent
drug cartel violence was caused by these guns Obama's ATF
intentionally caused to be sold and now Americans are being killed by
them. *Even the ATF has said these guns will be part of drug cartel
violence for years.
It seems that Obama has decided to declare war on the USA by using
parts of the bureaucracy to aid drug cartels and to obtain campaign
funds by selling guns to the cartels. *The DNC doesn't care if
Americans get killed just as they conspired to import children as sex
slaves to fund their campaigns.

What a crock.

What's next, an expose of how Reagan personally sold guns to the contras?

He's a mental case... and Reagan was also.

Without knowing it, the ATF has confessed to supplying nearly all
illegal guns to the Mexican drug cartels on the broder.
If they sent only 1700 guns as they (the ATF) say they did to the
cartel, what is the number of guns annually sent to Mexico illegally
for there to be a 50% probability of recovering one at a crime scene.
The ANSWER, 2X 1700 or 3400. What number total is required for there
to be a 50% probability of recovering TWO at a crime scene, answer,
2400. In other words, the ATF is the primary supplier of guns to the
mexican cartels.
Now, if they actually did recover over 700 at crime scenes as they say
they did, it turns out that the ATF must be providing nearly ALL of
the illegal guns sent to Mexico. What does this imply? It implies
that someone in the Obama admin is making big money from the drug
trade from Mexico, no wonder they do not want to enforce border
security.