Thread
:
Winning elections is not good enough
View Single Post
#
152
posted to rec.boats
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Winning elections is not good enough
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:54:39 -0500,
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:41:26 -0800,
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:49:27 -0500,
wrote:
Oops... Ford abolished the AEC. Nice try. FYI, Carter was a nuclear
engineer.
DoE was a Carter invention. Nobody said ERDA was a good idea either
but it was not the same huge bureaucracy DoE became.
I was in DC at the time, working in those buildings. I saw what
happened. Each time they changed the name, another office was started
up and the existing office just got a new sign. The joke at GSA was
they were going to hang the signs with thumb screws.
Sure... DoE... created by a Dem, therefore it's horrible. What total
nonsense. You just want to eliminate anything that doesn't directly
involved profit.
No it was bad because it was an extra layer of bureaucracy on top of
an already redundant layer on an agency that was working well.
According to you. So, no coordination among the disparate groups is
needed?? That's what you're claiming...
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]