On 20/02/2011 7:03 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:53:47 -0700,
wrote:

On 18/02/2011 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:20:04 -0700,
wrote:


The liberal lefties up here are the same. Irrational zealots of telling
others they will pay for their welfare. Nosy types too

he's RIGHT! let's do what the conservatives say!

welfare ONLY for the RICH! starve the middle class!


Well, you keep voting for it. Ever wonder where all that Obama spend
really goes? I mean REALLY goes?

HHAHAHAHA you're the right wing fool! YOU voted for welfare for the
rich. not me, sport

I didn't vote for Obama nor Bush. Deciding which banks/businesses get
bailed out by who the big depositors and creditors are doesn't work for
me, but I profited by following it. Hey, just because I don't agree
with it does not mean I didn't or shouldn't profit from it. Emotions
and stocks should be like church and state, separate.

The best USD based trick though was buying a load of Ford (NYSE:F) for
$2.25 and less and selling north of $7. Triple the money and in gains
in less than a year. I figured GM would be bailed out and Ford actually
benefited because so many suppliers are linked.

Hey, liberalism in ponzi debt has been good for me. You can't make this
kind of money in a stable well balanced economy and good honest money
management by government. No sir, the liberalism churns it up for big
swings.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.