Thread
:
Winning elections is not good enough
View Single Post
#
57
posted to rec.boats
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Winning elections is not good enough
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:57:25 -0500,
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:36 -0800,
wrote:
Please tell us which part of government you'd like to do without.
TSA
Homeland Security
Department of Energy
Department of education
Sure... no airport security
Sure... no security coordination
Sure... no energy policy or research
Sure... no coordinated education
shall I go on?
You're quite a humanitarian and patriot.
These functions were handled better before we created a bloated
bureaucracy to do it
Really? How's that? Who's going to do all those functions?
And then there is DEA that serves no function at all except to pioneer
new ways to take our rights.
expanded unwarranted searches
surveillance beyond the worst things NSA does
So, we shouldn't worry about meth and drug gangs. Power of the market
don't you know. Name some examples of unwarranted searches. Maybe you
have some personal experience you'd like to share? More nonsense about
your "privacy" rights, but you don't mind when all your personal data
is shared by banks and corporations. Of course, you don't want to
regulate those groups.
property abuses
Swat raids that kill innocents
etc
?? Where/when? Oh, I get it.. you're still fixated on Ruby Ridge.
... and doing absolutely nothing to stem the flow of drugs
Nothing at all or just not very well?
More right-wing, pseudo libertarian nonsense
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]