On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:51:34 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:34:05 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:24:52 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:03:57 +0700, Bruce
wrote:

Is Willie-boy physically capable of the task? I mean, an old retired
buy. Probably a little limber-ish :-)

Wait until Wilbur finds out that Jessica B was really Harry Krause
from rec-dot-boats.

Maybe two split personalities = one and Wilbur and HK are the proud
parents of Jessica.



I've heard of Harry Krause. I think rec.boats is his abode. Everybody over
there seems to hate that opinionated, big-mouth, know-it-all blowhard.
Thank
God the Rube knows enough to not besmirch rbc with his inadequacies lest
he
suffer continual smackdowns from the more erudite here.

rb added

Willbur, are you among "the more erudite" and, if not, how do you
recognize who is and who isn't? Do they sound smart or worldly?



I am perhaps the 'most' erudite of them all.

The subset of "more erudite" individuals may be gleaned by their consistent
ability to type a coherent paragraph or two while they spell, punctuate and
employ grammar in likewise manner to make their point in concise fashion.

When individuals post to Usenet it is imperative that they do so in as
professional and competent manner as possible. Any illiterate, lazy,
slipshod and inept English language usage is a barometer that measures the
worth of the composer. The worse the English of the message, the more
dubious the merit of the messenger. If one lacks pride or skill enough to
properly employ the tool of language in a forum where it's the only tool
then why bother giving the messenger due consideration?


Wilbur Hubbard

Wilbur, as I'm sure you know, sometimes a very simple,
well-constructed thought can be completely void of sophisticated words
or language and still be deep in meaning.

Professional and competent? Clearly, you're a sucker for form over
function.

Whatever.