BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Harryk

On 2/9/11 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:07:39 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:57:52 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:25:22 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:53:43 -0500, wrote:

Generals always want more troops and a bigger war. It is what they do
for a living, whether it is good foreign policy or not. That is why we
have civilian oversight.

So, which is it. Should Obama listen or not listen to military
experts? Bush said he would, but he didn't.

They both followed the same exact path. Obama is on the Bush schedule.

Right now, it makes sense to try and wind things down in Afg.
According to you, we should just get on a plane and leave. That's
shortsighted nonsense, and it makes no sense militarily or
politically.

It is interesting that when this was Bush's plan you folks all said
"get out now". Now that it is the Obama plan you have all the patience
in the world.

Really? Sounds to me like you're rewriting public opinion. Most people
once they found out the facts of Iraq said we should get out asap.
Most people thought that the Afg. war was justified. Feel free to keep
your eyes closed if it makes you feel better.

There were polls saying the Vietnam was the right thing to do too. It
all depends on what the talking heads on TV tell Americans to believe.
When the networks have their "Cronkite" moment, we will demand an end
to that war too.
You still can't ignore history. Harry has this one right. Afghanistan
is not a country, it is just a collection of tribes who hate each
other.
Like most of the countries in South West Asia, Afghanistan was the
creation of colonial European powers, not any natural political
division.

Harry is the only one who is consistent here.

In 50 years Iraq may be seen as the good war, if they actually come
out of it with a democracy. I doubt there will be any good coming out
of the Afghanistan war. There is absolutely ZERO chance that **** hole
will ever be a democracy.

Right. Because Iraq was Bush's war, but Afg. is Obamas? There is a
decent chance that they won't devolve back into Taliban control...

There is a fair to middling chance that Iraq might evolve into a
somewhat democratic government that successfully participates in the
global economy. Afghanistan will still be a **** hole that will remain
a tribal culture and the only participation in the world economy will
be the powerful will exploit the weak to produce a few natural
resources and a lot of smack.

According the you.... expert on all things, esp. those in the middle
east.

You don't have to be a middle east expert to predict that. You only
have to look at history (recent and long term). Iraq is a lot more
westernized than Afghanistan.

Well, as you're fond of saying, we'll see. It won't be an
American-style democracy, but it could be a relatively safe place,
free (for the most part) of terrorism.

We are going to be lucky not to lose Pakistan to the Taliban right
now. I think Afghanistan will go back to obscurity as soon as we leave
but I doubt it will ever be a real democracy.

Pakistan is making great strides in security. I hope you're not right.
If it happens, it became a reality because of Bush's negligence in the
region.

Yup the whole 1000 years or turmoil in the middle east is GWs fault.

Actually I do not remember any Bush incursions into sovereign
Pakistani territory. That is not true now. Each one of them is an act
of war.
The open question is how many acts of war does it take before you have
a war.
This is Obama's "Cambodia".

Ignorant, simple-minded religious zealotry.