Thread: Cyber-STalking
View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Hadenough Hadenough is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 257
Default Cyber-STalking

On Feb 7, 5:53*pm, paulatbyc wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:









On Feb 7, 5:39 pm, *wrote:
On 2/7/2011 5:07 PM, I am Tosk wrote:


In ,
says...


On 2/7/11 4:13 PM, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:19:36 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
* * wrote:


Cyber-stalking: ......


snip


You definition is rather vague.....


I posted this before, when this same subject arose, I'll do so, again:


http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/


The laws in Connecticut are basically a more detailed description of the
definition I posted. *Since Donnie has stated for many many years that
he believed EVERYONE in rec.boats should have to post their personal
information before allowing to make post in rec.boats, he can't suddenly
say that he was caused distress or was "harassed, annoyed, alarmed or
terrorized or was threatened to be killed or physically injured.


Since Donnie also published Tosk's personal information in rec.boats he
can't suddenly say he believed that this action would meet the criteria
of cyber-stalking. *Since Donnie has made numerous insults including
stated that Tosk was guilty of pedophilia he obviously doesn't believe
insults in rec.boats meet the criteria of being considered cyber-stalking.


If Donnie doesn't want a photo of his house posted in a public forum, he
should have followed the advice posted in rec.boats for many years, and
that is DON'T post private information in a public forum. *Donnie can't
suddenly say he wasn't aware that this could happen, when their are
hundreds of post concerning this topic, and hundreds of post by Donnie
stating that private information should be a requirement of posting in
rec.boats. *Donnie can't even plead ignorance.


The only one who has committed a crime here is Paul...


For posting generic info anyone can easily get right off the internet?


That's pretty funny.


Or are you talking about posting the address of a house out of which you
ran your internet business, the one you advertise on the net, and is a
matter of public record?


There's an email circulating with your particulars, including your
actual address, Ingersoll. I am not the only one who received a copy. I
won't dump your data, but someone else might.


--
I'm proud to be a progressive.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


The difference is I am not embarassed to be associated with my words,
as you are...


Are you referring to your words in which you call people ugly names,
publish their actual names and addresses, threaten them physically, and
worse?

I'm sure your words don't embarrass you. But they would embarrass any
decent person.

--
I'm proud to be a progressive.


Lets not forget the absolute trashy talk about my deceased Mother. MY
tirade...started AFTER those awe full words were posted...right here.

Tosky wont remember the "panty-sniffing,dead mother " comments. He'll
weasel out, AGAIN. At least I know WHAT I said .

You get everything YOU bring upon YOURSELF.

Go ahead, post the address you THINK I live at.

You posted right here, TODAY...that... " We know where you are"

Make sure that's put in your little Legal Folder. I'll put it in mine.

Scott Ingersoll
79 Brian Road
South Windsor, Connecticut