BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

[email protected]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:32:26 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:36:13 -0800, wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:02:48 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:20:36 -0800, wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:16:51 -0500, wrote:

There was a good reason why we used Gitmo and once Obama got inside
the tent, he couldn't come up with a better idea.
He is CnC and he could close the prison at Gitmo with a stroke of the
pen. He just doesn't know how do deal with the "detainees". So far,
virtually every one we have released, turned up back on the
battlefield fighting us.
The only mistake B/C made is we should have instituted the Obama
policy and not taken any prisoners. Just kill them. I am OK with that.

Untrue. He's been trying to close it in a responsible fashion

But you notice we are not taking prisoners now.

?? You're claiming we don't take people prisoners??????

I haven't heard about any, have you?
Where are they keeping them?

I guess you don't watch the news very often. People are being captures
all over.

We're not putting them in indefinite detention if that's what you
mean... beyond Due Process.

Where are they?

No idea. Not in Gitmo thanks to Obama.

Yes, in spite of all the hype. So, I guess just torturing a few
people, well that's ok? The fact is that there are other ways people
were tortured, but I guess you don't remember Abu Ghraib.

Maybe you should be more curious where the prisoners are. Do you
really think Karzai's goons are just putting panties on people's heads
or even waterboarding them when they want information. Those people
understand what torture really is. Since we don't really acknowledge
these prisoners even exist, they do not have to live through the
interrogation.

Google up "extraordinary rendition" and get back to me.

Maybe you should be more curious about getting to the bottom of the
serial liars Bush/Cheney. They screwed over the American people over
the course of two terms. Of course, it's Obama's fault or Clinton's or
Carters. Certainly not the laissez faire nonsense that was promoted by
Reagan and the Bushs.