BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

On 15 Sep 2003 04:01:20 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 14 Sep 2003 10:32:20 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Just because you're too stupid to understand english doesn't mean I'm a
liar. Are you really that moronic to understand that someone can be
guilt of neglect and more than just neglect at the same time? You said
you could show somewhere that I said I was NOT guilty of neglect. You
haven't done that yet. All you've done is to show where I said I was
indeed guilty of neglect and more than neglect. So you still owe me an
apology.

You are just too ****ing stupid to be shown ANYTHING. You said "it was
more than neglect." Now, are you really so dumb that you think
"neglect" and "more than neglect" mean the same thing?

Man are you an idiot. You really can't be an engineer because then you
would know something about set theory. It's obvious you don't know a
thing about it if you think that someone first saying they were guilty
of neglect and then adding they were also guilty of more than neglect
means they were lying when they said they were guilty of neglect.

Set theory doesn't apply, when you are spinning out of control, there.
You see, the flaw in your above idiotic diatribe is this: you didn't
say that you were ALSO guilty of "more than neglect." The difference
is so simple, I'd think that even you can figure it out, but maybe
not. You see, you said that you were guilty of "neglect", then when
confronted, said you were "guilty of more than neglect. Now, again, I
ask, do you honestly believe that "neglect", and "guilty of more than
neglect" mean the same identical thing?

You're pretty stupid if you think that whether or not they mean the same
identical thing has any bearing at all. For you to be right, if someone
says they are taller than 5' and then also says they are taller than 6'
then they were lying when they said they were taller than 5' if they are
6'3". After all, taller than 5' and taller than 6' do not mean the same
exact thing. You can be taller than 5' and taller than 6' at the same
time even if they don't mean the same thing,

In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and
guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they
were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more
than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they
claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've
said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you
to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you
haven't yet) then you owe me an apology.

Steve