Oh well......
"HarryK" wrote in message
m...
On 12/14/10 1:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote:
*e#c wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote:
On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote:
So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their
usual
name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish
behavior. I
knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think
it
says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get
noticed.
Like the ID Spoofers?
Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring,
scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :)
**** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet
names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your
ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer
is.
And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can
tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at
all, IF you're hiding your ISP number......
ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet
Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses.
When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host
Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs
CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide
" their IDs.
The real Harry must be hiding his also, huh?
Why am I the object of your obsession, herring?
Buy Johnny a new cookbook for Christmas. That should keep him occupied for
a month or so.
|